Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sankho Chaudhuri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Tyrenius (talk) 04:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sankho Chaudhuri

Not notable, I don't think. Just seems to be a timeline of events. Registered 734 Ghits. jj137 (Talk) 01:51, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 05:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Though references needed. One can't expect much online for an Indian artist who died in 2006 aged 90, but there should be obituaries at the least - oh there are & I've added one. Notability certainly asserted, and commissions are distinguished. Did nom actually look at the ghits, I wonder?Johnbod (talk) 05:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per User:Johnbod. If he was a nobody, he would not have his obit in the Telegraph. However, it's a crap article which reads like a CV, so I reckon it is pretty unencyclopaedic Ohconfucius (talk) 06:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The subject is notable. I have added few reliable sources to the article as well -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 11:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Johnbod and Ohconfucius. This is not yet an article, but Telegraph obit can be of aid. JNW (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 10:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.